你想和政观一起读文献吗？快来看看阅读大纲吧（认同专题）

悲情指数与壮烈浓度都极高的庚子年终于过去了。在这一年中，我们见证了无数的绝望与希望、告别与重逢、凋零与新生。与此同时，我们也经历了世界政治的光怪陆离、波诡云谲。对于大多数人而言，复杂的政治世界几乎是看不见、摸不着也想不到的。但政治又是无可逃避的，也许极少数精英的政治游戏就决定了绝大多数人的一生。为了让更多的读者了解政治、理解政治，也为了帮助相关领域的初学者更好地掌握知识，政文观止Poliview特决定在今年拓展知识传播与交流的渠道，在过去纯图文推送的基础上，有序尝试视频与直播模式。我们将安排充分熟悉相关领域的讲者和大家一起读好文献、聊真问题。

在近期，我们将首先推出当下学术界极为热门，舆论中也极为流行的认同专题。

讲授目的

快速文献冲浪，帮助掌握相关研究的知识图谱

引导发现真实有趣的研究议题

互相交流，教学相长

适合人群

相关专业的高年级本科生、硕士生、低年级博士生

有知识需求的考研、考博学子

业余社会科学爱好者（注：新手村模式，不适合职业玩家）

课程安排

六月择期开讲，每讲约一小时，期数待定。初期课程暂定免费，各位可任意打赏。后期课程可能收取低额辛苦费。各位读者如有建议或意见，欢迎踊跃留言。

第一部分 认同专题

一、 导论

认同研究是一片蓝海

Nicolas Tackett, The Origins of the Chinese Nation: Song China and the Forging of an East Asian World Order, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017.

Andreas Wimmer, Nation Building: Why Some Countries Come Together While Others Fall Apart: Princeton University Press, 2018.

Abdul Noury and Gerard Roland, “Identity Politics and Populism in Europe,” Annual Review of Political Science, Vol. 23, No. 1, 2020, pp. 421-439.

福山与认同的“血气”

Francis Fukuyama, Identity: The Demand for Dignity and the Politics of Resentment, New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2018.

Francis Fukuyama, “Against Identity Politics: The New Tribalism and the Crisis of Democracy,” Foreign Affairs, Vol. 97, No. 5, 2018, pp. 90-115.

Samuel P. Huntington, Who Are We?: The Challenges to America's National Identity, New York: Simon and Schuster, 2004.

追问20遍“我是谁”

Manford H. Kuhn and Thomas S. Mcpartland, “An Empirical Investigation of Self-Attitudes,” American Sociological Review, Vol. 19, No. 1, 1954, pp. 68-76.

认同大不同

Rogers Brubaker and Frederick Cooper, “Beyond "Identity",” Theory and Society,, Vol. 29, No. 1, 2000, pp. 1-47.

Philip Gleason, “Identifying Identity: A Semantic History,” The Journal of American History, Vol. 69, No. 4, 1983, pp. 910-931.

二、早期的认同研究

精神分析与认同危机

Erik H. Erikson, Childhood and Society, London: Paladin Grafton Books, 1993. pp. 36-38.

Erik H. Erikson, Identity: Youth and Crisis, New York: W. W. Norton & Company, 1968. pp. 165-175.

Erik. H. Erikson, “The Problem of Ego Identity,” Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, Vol. 4, No. 1, 1956, pp. 56-121.

James E Côté and Charles G Levine, Identity, Formation, Agency, and Culture: A Social Psychological Synthesis, Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers, 2002.

James E. Côté and Charles Levine, “A Formulation of Erikson's Theory of Ego Identity Formation,” Developmental Review, Vol. 7, No. 4, 1987, pp. 273-325.

Gordon W. Allport, The Nature of Prejudice, Reading: Addison Wesley Publishing Company, 1954.

社会学名人堂

George H. Mead, Mind, Self, and Society from the Standpoint of a Social Behaviorist, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1972.

Ralph Linton, The Study of Man: An Introduction, New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, Inc., 1936.

Nelson N. Foote, “Identification as the Basis for a Theory of Motivation,” American Sociological Review, Vol. 16, No. 1, 1951, pp. 14-21.

Erving Goffman, Stigma: Notes on the Management of Spoiled Identity, London: Penguin, 1963. pp. 11-12.

Greg Smith, Erving Goffman, London: Routledge, 2006.

Peter L. Berger, Invitation to Sociology: A Humanistic Perspective, New York: Anchor Books, 1963.

Peter L. Berger and Thomas Luckmann, The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge, London: Penguin Books Ltd, 1991.

三、成熟的认同理论

符号互动与角色扮演

Sheldon Stryker, Symbolic Interactionism: A Social Structural Version, Palo Alto: Benjamin/Cummings, 1980.

Sheldon Stryker and Richard T. Serpe, “Commitment, Identity Salience, and Role Behavior”, in William Iekes and Eric S . Knowles, eds., Personality, Roles, and Social Behavior, New York: Springer-Verlag, 1982. pp. 199-216.

Sheldon Stryker, “Identity Salience and Role Performance: The Relevance of Symbolic Interaction Theory for Family Research,” Journal of Marriage and the Family, Vol. 30, No. 4, 1968, pp. 558-564.

Clovis L. White and Peter J. Burke, “Ethnic Role Identity among Black and White College Students,” Sociological Perspectives, Vol. 30, No. 3, 1987, pp. 310-331.

想象的认同与群体偏见

Henri Tajfel, “Experiments in Intergroup Discrimination,” Scientific American, Vol. 223, No. 5, 1970, pp. 96-103.

Michael Diehl, “The Minimal Group Paradigm: Theoretical Explanations and Empirical Findings,” European Review of Social Psychology, Vol. 1, No. 1, 1990, pp. 263-292.

Dominic Abrams and Michael A. Hogg, Social Identifications: A Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations and Group Processes, London: Routledge, 1990.

Michael A. Hogg, “Subjective Uncertainty Reduction through Self-Categorization: A Motivational Theory of Social Identity Processes,” European Review of Social Psychology, Vol. 11, No. 1, 2000, pp. 223-255.

比较两种认同理论

Michael A. Hogg, Deborah J. Terry and Katherine M. White, “A Tale of Two Theories: A Critical Comparison of Identity Theory with Social Identity Theory,” Social Psychology Quarterly, Vol. 58, No. 4, 1995, pp. 255-269.

Jan E. Stets and Peter J. Burke, “Identity Theory and Social Identity Theory,” Social Psychology Quarterly, Vol. 63, No. 3, 2000, pp. 224-237.

四、作为变量的认同

定义与测量

Rawi Abdelal, et al., “Identity as a Variable,” Perspectives on Politics, Vol. 4, No. 04, 2006, pp. 695-711.

Rick Kosterman and Seymour Feshbach, “Toward a Measure of Patriotic and Nationalistic Attitudes,” Political Psychology, Vol. 10, No. 2, 1989, pp. 257-274.

Leonie Huddy & Nadia Khatib, “American Patriotism, National Identity, and Political Involvement”,  American Journal of Political Science, Vol.51, No.1, 2007, pp.63-77.

Gal Ariely, “Measuring Dimensions of National Identity across Countries: Theoretical and Methodological Reflections,” National Identities, Vol. 22, No. 3, 2019, pp. 265-282.

Gina Gustavsson and Ludvig Stendahl, “National Identity, a Blessing or a Curse? The Divergent Links from National Attachment, Pride, and Chauvinism to Social and Political Trust,” European Political Science Review, 2020, pp. 1-20.

描述与解释

Gal Ariely, “Globalisation and the Decline of National Identity? An Exploration across Sixty-Three Countries,” Nations and Nationalism, Vol. 18, No. 3, 2012, pp. 461-482.

Andreas Wimmer, “Power and Pride: National Identity and Ethnopolitical Inequality around the World,” World Politics, Vol. 69, No. 4, 2017, pp. 605-639.

Qingjiang Qj Yao and Carrol Haggard, “The Mediated Communities: Testing Media Effects on the Construction of National Identity, National Pride, and Global Identity in China, Brazil, India, South Africa, and the Us,” China Media Research, Vol. 12, No. 3, 2016, pp. 90-98.

Danny Osborne, Petar Milojev and Chris G. Sibley, “Authoritarianism and National Identity: Examining the Longitudinal Effects of SDO and RWA on Nationalism and Patriotism,” Pers Soc Psychol Bull, Vol. 43, No. 8, 2017, pp. 1086-1099.

Shawn Rosenberg and Peter Beattie, “The Cognitive Structuring of National Identity: Individual Differences in Identifying as American,” Nations and Nationalism, Vol. 25, No. 1, 2018, pp. 361-384.

讲者简介：

1. 陆屹洲，中国人民大学国际关系学院政治学系博士研究生，研究方向为政治心理与政治传播、演化社会科学，论文发表于《清华大学学报》（哲学社会科学版）、《上海交通大学学报》（哲学社会科学版）、《国际新闻界》、《新闻大学》、《社会主义研究》、《比较政治学研究》、《中央社会主义学院学报》等刊物。

2. 政文观止Poliview联合创始人，累计为平台供稿50余篇，原创输出十五万字。

3. 2020年获美国S大学访学邀请并获CSC资助资格，但其实现在也没有出得去。

4. 届かない二次元，虚空a证法师，入门级数据分析，broken oral English，曾参与设计某和谐系统，理性科学粉切黑祖安音痴手残艺术家。

编辑：张天一

你在看政观么