5.22

As we all know, risk-taking can be divided into many ways. One is that some people take risks to volunteer in severe disaster areas or high-risk epidemic areas. The other is to seek stimulation or unreasonable comparison. In my opinion, the greatest degree of risk-taking is to have a great help or reasonable promotion to the present and future life and work, which is a positive impact.

On the one hand, people choose to risk their lives and summon up the courage to volunteer in disaster areas or high-risk epidemic areas. Knowing that the people in the disaster area need to be pacified and the materials need to be transported, they all chose to contribute their strength to the disaster area.

On the other hand, some people like to take risks in order to seek stimulation or the existence of vanity. They tend to leave their lives out of the scope of thinking. For example, some teenagers show off their motorcycles on the roads with large traffic volume. They don't take any safety measures or consider the safety of other car owners and pedestrians. I think these risks are immoral.

So, I think risk-taking needs to be defined. What people strive for in the future, which is reasonable, legal and moral, is a positive risk. On the contrary, it is not advisable to take risks mixed with the competition of interests and evils.

众所周知，冒险分为很多种方式，一种是有一些人冒险去严重的灾区或疫情高风险区做志愿者，另一种是为了寻求刺激或不合理攀比的行为。我认为冒险的最大程度是对自己现在和未来的生活和工作都有极大的帮助或起合理性的推动作用的才是积极的影响。

一方面，人们选择冒着生命受到伤害的风险，鼓起勇气去灾区或高风险疫情的地方做志愿者。他们因为知道灾区的人们需要安抚，物资需要运送，所有选择了到灾区贡献自己的力量。

另一方面，一些人们喜欢冒险是为了寻求刺激，或者是虚荣心的存在。他们往往把生命抛到思考的范围之外。比如一些青少年在车流量大的马路上进行摩托车炫技表演，他们没做任何的安全措施，也没有考虑其他车主和行人的安全。我认为这些冒险就是不道德的。

所以，我认为，冒险是需要界定范围的。人们在合乎情理和法律道德上，为了未来奋斗的，属于积极的冒险。相反，参杂了利益和恶行竞争的冒险是不可取的。