伦敦大学学院教育学院的“如果…”系列学术辩论| 中英双语
2018.01.31 16:24
IOE in Hermione's eye
译者拍摄的校园一角
在开始阅读之前请注意：
这只是一个中国学生出于兴趣的翻译练习( 为什么要有这系列活动？已经举办了几场、主题分别是什么？)。尽管得到了学院的许可，但绝非这一系列辩论内容的官方译本，且不保证翻译精准度，更像是带有个人色彩的解读。如果你想要知道原意，请以英文官网为准：http://www.ucl.ac.uk/ioe/news-events/public-debates
Before you go, please notice:
This is just a Chinese student’s translation practice due to her own interest (the content will be about why IOE have these debates and what are the debates). Despite of permission from IOE, but this is not the official translation of the debates, nor a 100% correct translation to the original ideas. It is more like a personal interpretation. If you would like to know theoriginal ideas, please refer to: http://www.ucl.ac.uk/ioe/news-events/public-debates
Title: Introducing 'What If?' | UCL Institute ofEducation
标题：伦敦大学学院教育学院的“如果…”系列学术辩论
It begins with a 2-min introduction. Directorof the UCL Institute of Education, Professor Becky Francis, announced the launch of a new public engagement series of events.
这一切可以从一段两分钟的介绍视频说起。UCL教育学院院长Becky Francis教授在这系列辩论上线前录制了一段两分钟左右的视频，转录译制如下：
The IOE is a research powerhouse in the field of education and related areas of social science. Public engagement is another key part of what we do, and wewant to use our reputation and our scholarly excellence to help advance debateand understanding concerning education. So, what we are thinking about at thatend is creating a really stimulating out-ward facing events programme. That will bring these debates to the public, to education practitioners, and policymakers, and indeed to parents and students. We also want to bring some fresh thinking to pivotal debates in the field.
UCL教育学院是教育研究及相关领域的社会科学研究翘楚。我们一直很重视公众参与，而且我们也想要运用我们优良的名声和出色的学者来促进教育相关议题的辩论与理解。所以，我们最终想到不如开启一个有启发意义的、向外开放的系列活动。它将把这些辩论带给大众，带给教育实践者，政策制定者，还有家长和学生。我们也希望能够通过辩论给这一领域带来一些新鲜思想。
The events series is titled, “what if?” Radical and inspiring ideas for alternative futures. You can see that idea there is really to open up the space, to bring in some innovative thinking, and of course try to use research evidence to thisend as well. And through the series we will be bringing together a range ofcommentators, politicians, leading educational researchers and thinkers,leading practitioners and policy commentators and so on, really to stimulate debates from a whole range of different perspectives.
这一系列辩论都以同一个标题开启——“如果...”。由此开启的辩论汇聚着激进的想法和具有启发性的理念。你可以看到这些理念真的打开了整个空间，带来了富有革新精神的思考，当然我们也在这其中运用研究依据作为佐证。在这些系列活动中，我们会让评论员、政治家、教育研究者和思想家、教育实践者和政策评论员等汇聚一堂，为的就是从不同视角、领域全面激起辩论。
We want to generate debate. So, these will be panel discussions with lots of spacefor audience comment and participation, both in person and over social media aswell. We’ll be livestreaming and recording the debates to ensure maximum coverage and those will be on our website to share. I am really excited aboutthe IOE being an even bigger part of our public debate on educational issuesand look forward to welcoming everybody to the IOE to share in that debate.
我们想要生成辩论。所以，这系列活动中会有很多给在场和在线的听众评论和参与的空间。我们会实时直播并且录下视频，在IOE的网站上分享。我真心为IOE在教育辩论中承担更多而感到激动，也非常期待并欢迎所有人来IOE参与辩论并分享。
源自source：Introducing'What if’ | UCL Insititute of Education
https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=13&v=pVHXFmvp96U
Through this series we’ll be bringing together a range of commentators – academics, politicians, practitioners, policy wonks – and pushing them to bring someradical new thinking to some of the apparently intractable issues within education, not least the English education system.
通过这一系列辩论，我们让学者、政治家、实践者、政策专家进入辩论场，同时也推着他们给教育领域中一些显然很棘手的议题带来一些激进的新思维。当然这些议题不仅存在于英国的教育体系中。
This can help all of us reflect on the status quo, celebrate progress but also consider how we might change things for the better to achieve commonly held goals for our education system and what it can do for us all.
这样做会帮助我们所有人反思现状，为我们所取得的进展庆贺，同时又考量我们可能要如何改变一些事才能做得更好一些，以实现我们对教育系统的共同期待，并且实现目标的过程中所有人都能参与其中各司其职。
Previous #IOEDebates
What if.. we really wanted to transform teaching as a career choice?
What if... we really wanted to overcome the academic-vocational divide?
What if… we really wanted to further social mobility through education?
What if… we really wanted evidence-informed practice in the classroom?
已经举办的#IOE辩论包括：
如果…我们真的想要教学变成一种职业选择？
如果…我们真的想要跨越学术与职业的鸿沟？
如果…我们真的想要通过教育促进社会流动？
如果…我们真的想要教室里的实践循证为本？
源自 source：IOE Public Debates
http://www.ucl.ac.uk/ioe/news-events/public-debates
2017.01.30 22:32
如果我们真的想要教学变成一种职业选择？
What if… we really wanted to transform teaching as a career choice?
时间 Time：Dec 05, 2017 05:30-06:45pm
简介 Intro：
Teaching offers a buzz unlike any other job, yet we are struggling to attract and thenretain teachers in the profession. Where have we gone wrong, and how can we change things for the future?
教学带来的愉悦和其他工作不一样，然而我们却还在苦苦挣扎如何吸引并且让老师们留在这个职业里。我们到底是哪里走错了呢？我们又该如何在未来作出一些改变？
We’ve accepted that teaching may no longer be a lifelong vocation, and even made avirtue of that. We’re in the midst of trying to reduce teacher workloads, and there’s been talk of using technology to work around teacher shortages. But this is defeatist and piecemeal.
我们现在都接受教学可能不再是一个终身的职业，甚至认为能坚持一辈子是一种美德。当我们在想着如何减轻教师工作量的时候，也有一些关于用技术来解决教师短缺问题的讨论。但这似乎是失败主义者的论调，而且有些零碎。
Is it time for a more radical rethink of what the teacher’s role and remit should be in order to make the most of this vital profession?
那么现在是不是一个用激进的方式重新思考教师所承担的角色的好时机呢？为了从这个至关重要的专业性职业中获得最多，我们是否需要重新审视这个职业？
Speakers：
Mary Bousted, general secretary of the Association of Teachers and Lecturers, and the Association of Managers in Education
Jonathan Simons, Director of Policy and Advocacy at the Varkey Foundation
Lucy Crehan, International Education Consultant at the Education Development Trust; author, 'Cleverlands: The Secrets Behind the Success of the World’s Education Superpowers'.
Martin Mills, incoming Director of the Centre for Research on Teachers and Teaching at the UCL Institute of Education (IOE)
Chair: Professor Becky Francis, Director of the IOE
讲者：
Mary Bousted，教师与讲师协会（ATL）与教育管理者协会（AMiE）秘书长
Jonathan Simons，瓦尔基基金会政策与宣传部门负责人
Lucy Crehan, 教育发展信托的国际教育咨询顾问；畅销书作家，著有《Cleverlands:The Secrets Behind the Success of the World’s Education Superpowers》
Martin Mills, IOE即将成立的教师与教学研究中心负责人
主持人：Becky Francis教授，IOE院长
源自 source:
http://www.ucl.ac.uk/ioe/news-events/events-pub/dec-2017/what-if-transform-teaching-career-choice
如果…我们真的想要跨越学术与职业的鸿沟？
What if… we really wanted to overcome the academic-vocational divide?
时间 Time: Nov 28, 2017 05:30-06:45pm
简介 Intro：
It’s the stubborn divide that has endured across the decades, and seemingly more soin the English education system than in that of many other countries.
在过去的几十年中这个分离的趋势都在倔强地愈演愈烈，在英国尤为明显。
Why has the differential status of academic and vocational education been sointractable, and is there any real prospect of overcoming it? What if we werereally determined to level the playing field – what would it take?
为什么学术型教育和职业型教育这么不同，有没有可能跨越这一鸿沟？如果我们真的下定决心要一碗水端平——需要付出什么？
Speakers:
Mary Curnock Cook, former Chief Executive of UCAS; chair, Kensington and Chelsea College.
Tony Little, Chief Academic Officer at Global Education Management Systems (GEMS) and former Head Master of Eton.
Sir Michael Wilshaw, former Chief Inspector of Schools In England and Head of Ofsted
Alison Fuller, Professor of Vocational Education and Work and Pro-Director for Research and Development at the UCL Institute of Education (IOE)
Chair: Professor Becky Francis, Director of the IOE
讲者：
Mary Curnock Cook，前英国大学及院校招生事务处（UCAS）首席执行长，肯辛顿和切尔西学院主席
Tony Little, 全球教育管理系统（GEMS）首席学术官，伊顿公学前校长
Sir Michael Wilshaw,前英格兰学校总督察，英国教育标准局局长
Alison Fuller, 职业教育与工作方向教授，UCL IOE 研究与发展部门负责人
主持人：Becky Francis教授，IOE院长
源自 source:
https://www.ucl.ac.uk/ioe/news-events/events-pub/nov-2017/what-if-overcoming-academic-vocational-divide/
如果…我们真的想要通过教育促进社会流动？
What if… we really wanted to further social mobility through education?
时间 Time: Oct 31, 2017 05:30-06:45pm
介绍 Intro:
Boosting social mobility has been the rallying cry for Left and Right of late, with education highlighted as key to opening up life chances.
近年来英国的左派和右派在选举时都一直大声疾呼促进社会流动，而教育在其中往往被重点关注，被看作是开启人生机遇的钥匙。
It’s a cause that’s generated reams of policy wonkery, as well as a far-reachingeducation reforms – most recently the drive to provide 'powerful knowledge’ forall in schools, through to the removal of the cap on university student numbers.
这就催生了大量的政策专家解读，也使得教育改革触手越来越远-最近在学校中疾呼为了所有人“强有力的知识”就是其中之一，它不再只是关注进入大学的学生数目。
But is any of this really going to bring about the meritocracy that many say weshould aspire to, and any time soon? What if we wanted quicker results?
但这些变革是否真的会带来精英管理？有许多人说我们应该期待这一天的到来。那么如果我们想要得到更快的结果呢？
Speakers:
Kate Pickett, Professor of Epidemiology in the Department of Health Sciences at the University of York; co-author, 'The Spirit Level: Why Equality is Better for Everyone'.
Lord David Willetts, the Executive Chair of the Resolution Foundation
Diane Reay, Professor of Education at Cambridge University
James Croft, Chair of the Centre for Education Economics (CfEE)
Chair: Professor Becky Francis, Director of the UCL Institute of Education (IOE)
讲者：
Kate Pickett，约克大学健康科学系流行病学教授；与人合著《The Spirit Level: Why Equality is Better for Everyone》
Lord David Willetts, 决议基金会执行主席
Diane Reay，剑桥大学教育学教授
James Croft, 教育经济中心主席
主持人：Becky Francis教授，IOE院长
源自 source:
http://www.ucl.ac.uk/ioe/news-events/events-pub/oct-2017/what-if-furthering-social-mobility-through-education
如果…我们真的想要教室里的实践循证为本？
What if… we really wanted evidence-informed practice in the classroom?
时间 Time: Jan 23, 2018 05:45-07:00pm
介绍 Intro:
There’s been a big push to get classroom practice shaped by evidence of 'what works’. This has been largely inspired by advances in healthcare, where the use ofresearch trials and national guidelines to improve patient care and outcomes ismore established.
依据研究发现“什么有效”日益在推动教室里的实践中扮演越来越重要的角色。这在很大程度上受到了医学研究的影响。在健康医疗研究领域中对病患的关怀及治疗效果都因为研究试验、国家准则的确立有了显著提升。
But this approach has not gone uncontested in education (or health) and 'evidence-informed practice’ is still to be firmly embedded across all schools. Why is this, and do we even have a shared understanding of what we’re aiming for when it comes to teachers’ engagement with and use of research?
但这种方法应用于教育（或健康）研究其实并非毫无争议，但循证为本的实践模式仍然是学校中坚实的基础。为什么会这样？与此同时，当涉及到教师的参与和研究的应用时，我们是否真的对我们所追求的目标享有共同的理解？
This event heard from leading commentators about whether, in their view, this is the correct agenda for education and, if so, what evidence-informed practice shouldlook like and the steps needed to realise that vision across all schools. Join the debate about the implications for practice, teacher professionalism andeducation research itself.
这次活动我们会听到出色的评论员们从他们的观点出发，就教育中的正确议程，比如循证为本的实践模式应该是什么样？在所有的学校实现这一愿景的过程中又要采取哪些必要的步骤？欢迎来参与我们的讨论，一起探讨教育实践、教师专业化和教育研究本身。
Speakers:
Daniel Muijs, Head of Research, Ofsted
Sir Kevan Collins, Chief Executive, Education Endowment Foundation (EEF)
Ann Mroz, Editor, Tes
Gert Biesta, Professor of Education and Director of Research, Brunel University London
Chair: Becky Francis, Director, UCL Institute of Education
讲者：
Daniel Mujis, 英国教育标准局研究部门负责人
Sir Kevan Collins, 教育捐助基金会首席执行长
Ann Mroz，编辑，TES（英国泰晤士报教育副刊，TES Global为全球最大的教师社区与招聘平台）
Gert Biesta, 伦敦布鲁内尔大学教育学教授，分管研究的院长
主持人：Becky Francis教授，IOE院长
源自 source:
http://www.ucl.ac.uk/ioe/news-events/events-pub/jan-2018/what-if-evidence-informed-practice
2018.01.29 16:11
Here comes a poll for you to vote for what you want to see most in next article. Your choice will decide what translation of debate summary comes first? And please let me know aboutwhat else you want to 'debate’.
最后我想邀请坚持看到这里的你，参与一次投票。你的投票将会决定哪一篇中英双语的辩论概要先出现。如果你愿意，也请你在留言区告诉我你想要辩论的主题。
（投票截止日期为：伦敦时间2018.02.08 00:00）