20171227 长难句每日一句
你能坚持多久?我就能陪伴多久!
【昨日回顾】
Historians, especially those so blinded by their research interests that they have been accused of “tunnel method,” frequently fall victim to the “technical fallacy.”
史学家,尤其是那些单纯局限于他们研究兴趣的史学家,被指责为使用“单方向研究法”,他们常常成为“纯技术方法论”的牺牲品。
【今日长难句】
Also common in the natural sciences, the technical fallacy mistakenly identifies the discipline as a whole with certain parts of its technical implementation.
你要先自己尝试来分析一下
然后再去看解析
动笔抄写
坚持到考前,效果更好
有问题,欢迎长按二维码分答提问
【结构解析】
1. also common in the natural sciences, 为形容词短语充当状语成分修饰整个句子。
2. 句子主干为主谓宾宾补结构,即:the technical fallacy /mistakenly identifies/ the discipline as a whole /with certain parts of its technical implementation; 其中难点在于固定搭配 identify sth. with sth. 译为:认为某事物等同于.
【词的处理】
fallacy / ˈfæləsi / n. 错误,谬论
discipline / ˈdisəplin / n. 学科
as a whole 作为一个整体
certain / ˈsə:tn/ adj. 某个,某人,某事
implementation / impliment'teiʃ(ə)n / n. 实施,履行
【参考译文】
Also common in the natural sciences, the technical fallacy mistakenly identifies the discipline as a whole with certain parts of its technical implementation.
“纯技术方法论”错误地把整个学科与学科研究的某些操作方法等同起来,这种情况在自然科学领域里也屡见不鲜。
【明日长难句】
It applies equally to traditional historians who view history as only the external and internal criticism of sources, and to social science historians who equate their activity with specific techniques.
很多考研的长难句,很绕!
你需要多看两遍
坚持下去,习惯了就不觉得难了