美国商业秘密保护简介

每日IP英文第395期:

In brief: protection of trade secrets USA

October 3 2020 | Milbank LLP - John Lu and Mollie Galchus
Protection
Legislation and legal definition
What legislation governs the protection of trade secrets in your jurisdiction? How is a ‘trade secret’ legally defined?
Trade secrets in the United States are governed by federal and state law.
The Uniform Trade Secrets Act (UTSA), a uniform law proposed by the American Law Institute in the 1970s, has been adopted by every state except New York and North Carolina.
Section 1 of the UTSA defines a trade secret as:
information, including a formula, pattern, compilation, program, device, method, technique, or process, that: (1) derives independent economic value, actual or potential, from not being generally known to, and not being readily ascertainable by proper means by, other persons who can obtain economic value from its disclosure or use, and (2) is the subject of efforts that are reasonable under the circumstances to maintain its secrecy.
The Defend Trade Secrets Act of 2016 created a federal civil cause of action for trade secret misappropriation. Federal courts also have jurisdiction over criminal trade secret actions that fall under the Economic Espionage Act of 1996.
Ownership
How is ownership of a trade secret established?
Since a trade secret is protected information, ownership will only be established if the holder has taken reasonable precautions to protect the non-public proprietary information from discovery by other entities. One cannot establish ownership of information that is common knowledge or readily ascertainable. However, a trade secret holder generally needs to establish relative secrecy, not complete secrecy.
Secrecy
What criteria are used to establish the state of secrecy of a trade secret before misappropriation or disclosure?
Section 1 of the Uniform Trade Secret Act provides that secrecy of information is established when the information is not ‘generally known’ or ‘readily ascertainable’ by others who may obtain economic value from the information. According to the Restatement of Torts, there must be ‘a substantial element of secrecy’ that would make it difficult to acquire the information without improper means.
One cannot claim public information or general knowledge in an industry as one’s trade secret. According to the Restatement, information may remain secretive even when disclosed to ‘employees involved in its use’ and ‘others pledged to secrecy’. Secrecy is not extinguished when others independently discover the secret information and continue to keep the information a secret.
The Restatement lists the following six factors to consider when determining whether information is a trade secret:
(1) the extent to which the information is known outside of his business; (2) the extent to which it is known by employees and others involved in his business; (3) the extent of measures taken by him to guard the secrecy of the information; (4) the value of the information to him and to his competitors; (5) the amount of effort or money expended by him in developing the information; (6) the ease or difficulty with which the information could be properly acquired or duplicated by others.
Commercial value
How is the commercial value of a trade secret established?
A trade secret’s value is established if the secret gives its owner a ‘competitive advantage’ (Roger M Milgrim, Milgrim on Trade Secrets). According to section 1 of the Uniform Trade Secrets Act, a trade secret is information that ‘derives independent economic value, actual or potential’ because it is a secret. Value is established ‘if the trade secret would be useful to a competitor and would require cost, time, and effort to duplicate’ (Milgrim). Value may be established without a formal valuation of the secret and the secret ‘need not be vital to its owner’s business’. The definition of a trade secret also includes negative commercial value, which exists when research proves that a technique would not be of great value to a competitor.
Protective measures
What criteria are used to determine whether the rights holder has adopted reasonable protective measures to prevent disclosure and misappropriation of trade secrets?
Reasonable efforts must be taken to maintain the secrecy of a trade secret.
Courts assess the reasonableness of protective measures based on a totality of the circumstances. For example, in Rockwell Graphic System, Inc v DEV Industries, Inc, the Seventh Circuit stated that disclosure of a trade secret to a ‘limited number of outsiders for a particular purpose’ does not extinguish trade secret protection. The court found that after looking at the physical and contractual precautions taken by Rockwell to protect its engineering drawings, a jury could find that the secrecy efforts were reasonable.
Best practices
What best practices and internal policies should rights holders consider to ensure maximum protection of their trade secrets?
A trade secret holder must take reasonable precautions to protect the secret. Trade secret holders should employ the following measurements: notice of secrecy and confidentiality, cautionary signs, restricted access for visitors, separation of internal processes to keep the complete information from single departments or employees, locks and other security measures, and passwords.
Trade secret holders should implement policies and procedures that train employees and hold them to confidentiality agreements. In the treatise Milgrim on Trade Secrets, Roger M Milgrim suggests that employers should screen new hires about restrictive covenants protecting trade secrets from prior employment relationships, and should determine whether the new hire ‘ha[s] a track record of innovative work that requires special attention, such as providing for a contractual definition of proposed activities within the scope of employment. . . .’
Milgrim suggests that employers should notify employees, through hiring agreements and employment contracts, of the employer’s confidentiality policies and the types of materials that are protected. Further, an employer should notify an employee at hiring that when the employee leaves, he or she will be required to tell the employer the ‘identity of the next employer, that employer’s address and telephone number and the proposed activity that the employee will be involved in’. Employers should also allow departing employees to consult the employer about further questions and conflicts that arise after the employee departs.
Law stated date
Correct on
Give the date on which the information above is accurate.
12 August 2020.
-End-
Source:https://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=2d05dd75-629f-4da1-b8d9-ccf8462d4068
Each article is copyrighted to their original authors. The news is for informational purposes only and does not provide legal advice.
(0)

相关推荐

  • The Secret

    The Secret

  • 员工跳槽时带走客户该怎么办?—浅析客户名单的商业秘密保护

    员工跳槽时带走客户可能是每一位老板都特别担心的事情,毕竟客户是能给企业带来盈收的"核心资产",员工带走了一位客户即意味着企业少了一份收入,因此往往老板都会把客户紧紧地抓在自己的手中 ...

  • 发电机主保护简介

    发电机主保护简介

  • 发电机及主保护简介.doc 全文免费

    发电机及主保护简介 发电机是汽轮发电机组三大重要组成部分之一. 一. 发电机工作原理:在 定子 铁芯槽内沿定子铁芯内圆,每相隔120o分别安放着放有A.B.C三相并且 线圈匝数相等的线圈,转子上有励磁 ...

  • NPR,WNYC,PRI到底是什么东西?美国公共广播系统简介

    注:这些信息主要来自个人经验和最新一期的On the Media节目. 许多人不论是在国内还是在美国,喜欢收听美国的公共广播节目.但是公共广播经常会有一些搞来搞去的缩写,有时候在美国,跑到费城听到的广 ...

  • 火力电厂FCB小岛运行保护简介

    一,什么是火力发电机组FCB运行?  FCB(Fast Cut Buck)又称小岛运行,指火电机组在电网或线路出现故障,而机组本身运行正常的情况下,机组主变出线断路器跳闸,不联跳汽机和锅炉,汽机保持3 ...

  • 海地政府请求美国出兵保护 被拒绝

    当地时间2021年7月9日,海地太子港,警局附近. 人民视觉 图 海地总统莫伊兹7月7日遇刺后,该国政府官员已经请求美国派遣军队来保护港口.机场.油气存储地等关键基础设施.但这一请求遭到了美国的拒绝, ...

  • 从洗衣机看美国贸易保护 究竟坑到了谁?

    [作者微信号]:bzzcaijing(也可输入:平说财经) 结果一出,最开心的恐怕要算美国洗衣机制造商惠而浦,而最让人感到失望的是日.韩品牌的洗衣机制造商.为此,韩国洗衣机制造商LG则在一份官方声明中 ...

  • 商业秘密保护,有什么意义?

    来源:乐辉商业秘密律师 在2019年4月23日之前,<反不正当竞争法>对于商业秘密的定义为"不为公众所知悉.具有商业价值并经权利人采取相应保密措施的技术信息和经营信息" ...

  • 六大商业秘密保护法则,你都懂了吗?

    来源:乐辉商业秘密律师 按照法律规定,商业信息除了要满足秘密性.实用性外,还必须是经权利人采取了保密措施的技术信息和经营信息.因此,对商业信息采取保密措施也是商业秘密的构成要件之一.秘密性即不为公众所 ...