这两艘船舶滞留堪称经典

第一艘船9114050，日本船级社，杂货船，滞留3天，20条缺陷，5条滞留缺陷，滞留缺陷分别为：

EMERGENCY SYSTEMS: ENGINE DRIVEN EMERGENCY FIRE PUMP FAILED TO START MORE THAN 10 MINUTES AFTER COMMENCING MANUAL CRANKING OF ENGINE. PLENTY OF WATER WAS FOUND IN THE FUELSUPPLY LINE.,应急消防泵10分钟之内没启动，燃油管线中发现大量的水。缺陷依据为：S74-24/CII-2/R10.2.2.3 ; FSSC/C12;

EMERGENCY SYSTEMS: THE SECTION OF PIPE, WHICH LOCATED INSIDE ENGINE ROOM, FROM EMERGENCY SEA SUCTION VALVE TO EMERGENCY FIRE PUMP AT STEERING GEAR ROOM WITHOUT A-60INSULATION., 应急消防泵吸入管线在机舱内，机舱内的阀门没有进行A-60包裹

缺陷依据为：S74-11/CII-2/R4.6.3

ISM: CREW NOT FAMILIAR WITH REMOTE OPERATION AND RESET PROCEDURE OF EMERGENCY FIRE PUMP SUCTION VALVE. VALVE WAS FOUND SEIZED AT CLOSE POSITION DURING TESTING., 船员不熟悉应急消防泵吸入阀的操作，测试期间阀被卡在关闭位置，缺陷依据应该为： ISMC/S6;

SAFETY OF NAVIGATION: S-VDR MICROPHONE MALFUNCTION SINCE MAY 2017 AS PER MASTER. NO EXEMPTION DOCUMENTS FROM FLAG ADMINISTRATION AVAILABLE. NO NOTIFICATION TO PORT AUTHORITY BEFORE ARRIVAL.,

自2017年5月，S-VDR麦克风损坏，既没有船旗国的免除证书也没有通知港口国（个人觉得则缺陷开的比较完美，将免除证书和通知船旗国的事情说清楚，免得船方抵赖）

缺陷依据： S74-24/CV/R20; A.1052/Ch.2.3.7ISM: SAFETY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM AS IMPLEMENTED ONBOARD DOES NOT ENSURE THAT THE SHIP IS MAINTAINED IN CONFORMOTY WITH RELEVANT RULES AND REGULATIONS AS EVIDENCED BY DEFICIENCY NO.1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 8, 9, 12, 13, 14, 17.（通过缺陷1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 8, 9, 12, 13, 14, 17说明SMS体系在该轮没有有效的运行）

缺陷依据：ISMC/S10;

整体看一台应急消防泵被判定3项滞留缺陷，一项S-VDR，一项由上述缺陷触发的体系缺陷。

第二艘船为：9444742，2010年建造集装箱船，ABS船级社，知名管理公司：Columbus Shipmanagement GmbH，5条缺陷，有且仅有一条滞留缺陷，滞留缺陷为：

SAFETY OF NAVIGATION: BRIDGE NAVIGATION LIGHTS CONTROL SYSTEM MALFUNCTION,（驾驶台导航灯控制系统损坏）

Columbus Shipmanagement GmbH公司在全球有很高的知名度，10年的集装箱船，本应在最好的运营状态，仅仅因此这么一条缺陷被滞留，管理状态让人疑惑，怎么会这样呢？