远隔缺血预处理减轻肺叶切除术后氧化性肺损伤:单中心随机双盲对照试验

    本公众号每天分享一篇最新一期Anesthesia & Analgesia等SCI杂志的摘要翻译,敬请关注并提出宝贵意见

Remote Ischemic Preconditioning Decreases Oxidative Lung Damage After PulmonaryLobectomy: A Single-Center Randomized, Double-Blind, Controlled Trial.

背景与目的

肺癌患者行肺叶切除术期间,手术侧肺往往存在萎陷和低灌注,肺复张时可发生缺血/再灌注损伤。我们假设远隔缺血预处理(RIPC)会降低肺的氧化损伤及改善术后气体交换。

方  法

我们对罹患非小细胞肺癌行择期肺叶切除的患者进行了一项单中心、随机、双盲试验。全麻诱导后即刻53例患者随机分为接受肢体RIPC组(3个周期:通过大腿缺血袖套模拟5分钟缺血/ 5分钟的缺血再灌注)和/或无RIPC对照组。麻醉诱导后和RIPC、手术前和术中立即测定呼出气冷凝液和动脉血中的氧化应激标志物(EBC)(T0,基础值) ;在萎陷肺,复肺通气恢复前即刻(TLV)(T1);恢复TLV即刻(T2);恢复TLV120分钟后(T3)。主要结果为EBC在T1、T2和T3时点 8-异前列腺素的水平。次要成果包括以下内容:NO2,NO3,H2O2含量和EBC和血中pH(8-异前列腺素,NO2+NO3)及肺气体交换变量(PaO2/FiO2、A-aDO2,a/A比和呼吸指数)。

结  果

与对照组相比,T1、T2和T3时点,接受RIPC的患者EBC中 8-异前列腺素水平较低(均值和95%置信区间的差异):分别为-15.3(5.8-24.8),P = .002;-20(5.5-34.5),P = .008;和-10.4(2.5-18.3),P =.011。RIPC组在T1、T2、T3EBC 中NO2,NO3和H2O2的水平也低于对照组(P < .05)。RIPC组在T2时点,血8-异前列腺素和NO2 、NO3较低(P < .05)。肺叶切除术后,RIPC组与对照组相比,在2小时、8小时和24小时有更好的PaO2/FiO2。

结  论

肺切除术中,肢体RIPC降低 EBC中 8-异前列腺素水平和其他氧化性肺损伤标志物。RIPC提高了由PaO2/FiO2比值反映的术后的气体交换。

原始文献摘要

García-de-la-Asunción J1, Bruno L, Perez-Griera J, Galan G, Morcillo A

Remote Ischemic Preconditioning Decreases Oxidative Lung Damage After PulmonaryLobectomy: A Single-Center Randomized, Double-Blind, Controlled Trial.  Anesth Analg. Aug 2017 ;125(2):499-506. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000002065.

BACKGROUND:

During lobectomy in patients with lung cancer, the operated lung is often collapsed and hypoperfused. Ischemia/reperfusion injury may then occur when the lung is re-expanded. We hypothesized that remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) would decrease oxidative lung damage and improve gas exchange in the postoperative period.

METHODS:

We conducted a single-center, randomized, double-blind trial in patients with nonsmall cell lung cancer undergoing elective lung lobectomy. Fifty-three patients were randomized to receive limb RIPC immediately after anesthesia induction (3 cycles: 5 minutes ischemia/5 minutes reperfusion induced by an ischemia cuff applied on the thigh) and/or control therapy without RIPC. Oxidative stress markers were measured in exhaled breath condensate (EBC) and arterial blood immediately after anesthesia induction and before RIPC and surgery (T0, baseline); during operated lung collapse, immediately before resuming two-lung ventilation (TLV) (T1); immediately after resuming TLV (T2); and 120 minutes after resuming TLV (T3). The primary outcome was 8-isoprostane levels in EBC at T1, T2, and T3. Secondary outcomes included the following: NO2+NO3, H2O2 levels, and pH in EBC and in blood (8-isoprostane, NO2+NO3) and pulmonary gas exchange variables (PaO2/FiO2, A-aDO2, a/A ratio, and respiratory index).

RESULTS:

Patients subjected to RIPC had lower EBC 8-isoprostane levels when compared with controls at T1, T2, and T3 (differences between means and 95% confidence intervals): -15.3 (5.8-24.8), P = .002; -20.0 (5.5-34.5), P = .008; and -10.4 (2.5-18.3), P = .011, respectively. In the RIPC group, EBC NO2+NO3 and H2O2 levels were also lower than in controls at T2 and T1-T3, respectively (all P < .05). Blood levels of 8-isoprostane and NO2+NO3 were lower in the RIPC group at T2 (P < .05). The RIPC group had better PaO2/FiO2 compared with controls at 2 hours, 8 hours, and 24 hours after lobectomy in 95% confidence intervals for differences between means: 78 (10-146), 66 (14-118), and 58 (12-104), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS:

Limb RIPC decreased EBC 8-isoprostane levels and other oxidative lung injury markers during lung lobectomy. RIPC also improved postoperative gas exchange as measured by PaO2/FiO2 ratio.

罂粟花

麻醉学文献进展分享

联系我们

电话:1331*****13
(0)

相关推荐